• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
American Judicature Society

American Judicature Society

Advocating for a fair system of justice

  • About Us
    • Mission
    • History
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
  • AJS News
  • Awards
    • Overview
    • 2025
      • Awardee
      • Photos
      • Program
      • Video
    • 2021
      • Awardees
      • Photos
      • Program
  • Civic Education
    • Overview
    • Education Units and Lessons
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Websites
    • Other Resources
  • Events
    • Annual Meeting
    • Annual Program
    • Forum
    • Member Orientation
    • National Conference
      • 2021 Presentations
      • 2021 Program
      • 2021 Speakers
      • 2021 Videos
      • 2021 Photos
  • Membership/Donate
  • Publications
  • Sidebar Program
  • Webinars
search icon

Search Results for:

MAHALO TO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DR. SYLVIA YUEN

July 27, 2026

With deep regret, AJS has accepted the resignation of Executive Director Dr. Sylvia Yuen, effective July 31. Since beginning her tenure in 2021, Dr. Yuen has expanded AJS’s outreach, modernized its internal systems, and developed a stronger organizational foundation for long‑term success.

We are grateful that Dr. Yuen will continue to serve as AJS’s Vice President, ensuring her insight and experience remain part of the Society’s leadership. AJS extends its sincere appreciation for her dedicated service and for the many contributions she has made to advance the mission of the American Judicature Society to secure and promote an independent and qualified judiciary and a fair system of justice. 

2026 Sidebar – An Inspiring AJS Event

July 20, 2026

Read about the highly successful 31st Annual Sidebar Program on July 15, 2026, which brought together young lawyers, summer associates, law clerks, and law student externs for a discussion about the challenges AI is creating for today’s young attorneys.

31st Annual Sidebar Program – Register Now!

June 3, 2026

The Impacts of Artificial Intelligence Upon the Judiciary

February 2, 2026

“The Impacts of Artificial Intelligence Upon the Judiciary, ” a webinar held in October 2025 and sponsored by the American Judicature Society (AJS), featured Professor Emile Loza de Siles of the William S. Richardson School of Law, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa. In the webinar, Professor Loza presented highlights from her recent national study, which was supported by AJS with funds donated by the Okinaga Ohana. The Honorable John M. Tonaki of Hawaiʻi First Circuit Court served as moderator for the event, which was well-attended by some 100 judges, practitioners, and others.

Professor Loza brings a distinguished background, as a clinical scientist, well-experienced technology and intellectual property attorney, and legal scholar focused on artifical intelligence law and policy. She holds a juris doctorate from The George Washington University School of Law with additional graduate education from Georgetown, Harvard and the University of Houston. She is also a long-standing member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, the world’s largest technology professional association, and serves on its Artifical Intelligence Policy Committee.  In addition, she sits on the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court’s inaugural “Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts,” which issued its final report to Acting Chief Justice Sabrina McKenna in December 2025.

Professor Loza’s study and the webinar addressed and thoughtfully explored the far-reaching influences of AI upon the judiciary. Her landmark study centered upon several key objectives:

  1. to positively impact the legal community,
  2. to provide knowledge and serve as a thought model with potential national influence on courts; and
  3. to help shape the future of the judiciary by enabling AI’s effects on courts and judicial decision-making to be identified and anticipated.

Among her “Recommendations to the Judiciary”, were:

  1. Responsible AI Governance — Courts should institute responsible AI governance frameworks and procedures as soon as reasonably possible;
  2. Ethically Grounded AI Governance — The judiciary should build its system of responsible AI governance upon the well-established codes of judicial conduct;
  3. Comprehensive AI Governance — Judicial leaders should strategically expand their AI-related orders, rules and other AI governance measures to look beyond generative AI and to comprehensively address the types of AI that impact upon  the courts, judicial decision-making, court administration, and access to justice; and
  4. Transparency — Laws and practices to protect the legitimacy of the courts, the independence of judicial decision-making, and ensure careful compliance with the law, relevant standards for AI procurement, and judicial and professional ethical rules.

Recognizing the rapidly evolving growth of AI and its potential for profoundly positive and negative impacts upon judicial practice and the practice of law, AJS expresses deep appreciation for Professor Loza’s Executive Summary. Her in-depth report provides an overview of her key findings, traces the historical landscape of AI’s evolution nationally and internationally, and identifies gaps in AI governance. It concludes with a hopeful, forward-looking perspective intended to serve as a guidepost for the judiciary in the constantly developing discipline that increasingly impacts the rule of law.

Professor Loza’s Executive Summary on The Impacts of Artificial Intelligence upon the Judiciary, a National Study, can be accessed by clicking below.

Click here or the image above to access the report

A Message of Gratitude from AJS

January 28, 2026


As we reflect on the past year, the American Judicature Society extends its deepest
appreciation to the generous individuals and organizations whose financial support has sustained and strengthened our mission. Your contributions—at every level—have been vital to our ongoing efforts to protect the integrity of the American justice system and to promote an independent and qualified judiciary.

In a time when the principles of fairness, impartiality, and judicial independence face growing challenges, your commitment to our cause has never been more meaningful. We are honored to recognize your generosity and proud to count you among our community of advocates for justice. Thank you for standing with AJS and for helping us champion a fair and impartial system of justice for all.

Addressing Judicial Vacancies

January 14, 2026

Judicial vacancies have posed a persistent challenge in Hawaii. In recent years, the number of qualified applicants for judicial positions has declined significantly, leading to delays in the appointment and confirmation of judges and justices. A healthy democracy depends on all three branches of government operating effectively, and a fully staffed, highly qualified judiciary is essential to that balance.

The American Judicature Society (AJS), whose mission is to promote an independent and competent judiciary and a fair system of justice, has identified judicial vacancies as one of its top priorities.

To address the issue, a Special Committee on Judicial Vacancies has been established to identify barriers that discourage individuals from applying and to recommend improvements to the recruitment and application process. Market Trends Pacific, a professional market research firm, has been engaged to conduct an online survey of individuals who have been identified as qualified candidates. The survey aims to gather data on the factors that may deter applicants from pursuing judicial positions. All responses will be kept strictly confidential, and no individual respondent will be identifiable. The Hawaii State Judiciary supports the initiative.

The Special Committee on Judicial Vacancies is co-chaired by Judge J. Michael Seabright and Jan Boivin. Other members of the committee are: Nathan Hokama (co-reporter); Judge (ret.) Trudy Senda (co-reporter); Dr. David Ball; Timothy Johns; Judge (ret.) Walter Kirimitsu; Russell Lau; Judge Kanani Laubach; Carrie Okinaga; Randy Perreira; Sen. Karl Rhoades; and Dr. Sylvia Yuen (ex-officio).

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 19
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

A more diverse judiciary enhances an exchange of perspectives and a cross-fertilization of ideas that keeps biases in check.

Charles Geyh
Charles Geyh
John F. Kimberling Professor of Law,
Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Footer

American Judicature Society / 1164 Bishop Street, Suite 618 / Honolulu, HI 96813
Email: [email protected]

American Judicature Society
1164 Bishop Street, Suite 618
Honolulu, HI 96813
Email: [email protected]